Projected Coordinate Systems

A map projection is a flattened GCS. Imagine sending rays of light through the ellipsoid onto a flat surface, the resulting image is a projection.

How do we construct projections?

A GCS is projected onto a surface that can be flattened.

Planar: A 2D flat plane

Conic: A 2D cone

Cylindrical: A 2D cylinder

Planar/Azimuthal

Simplest option but limited applicability/scope. Usually only used for polar regions.

Planar/Azimuthal

Planar/Azimuthal

Conic

Great for mid-latitudes. Can only cover one hemisphere at a time.

Conic: BC Albers

Conic: Canada Lambert

Conic Projection vs. Latitude/Longigude

Conic Projection - Nicely accounts for curvature of the earth.

Lat/Lon - Scruched & distorted image when displayed in 2 dimmensions.

Cylindrical

Works for the full Earth (Normal). Or applied to small slices (Transverse)

Cylindrical: Mercator

Cylindrical: Sinusoidal

Classes of Projection

Conformal: Shapes are preserved.

Equal-area: Areas is preserved.

Equidistant: Distance is preserved (*limited)

True-direction: Direction is preserved (*limited)

Compromise: Splits the difference for aesthetics

Conformal Projections

Conformal Projections

No angular deformation, but area is severely distorted.

Scale changes across the map, poor for measuring distances or areas.

Lambert Conformal Conic

Equal Area

Equal Area

Preserves area but angles/shapes are deformed.

Very useful in GIS where area must be preserved for land analysis.

Albers Equal Area

Universal Transverse Mercator

Globe is divided into strips 6 degrees wide. Zones span from 80N to 80S.

Universal Transverse Mercator

Each zone is projected on a transverse cylinder.

Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM)

Little distortion within zones – great for mapping small areas.

UTM Zone 8

Macknezie River Delta: a long, narrow feature

UTM Zone 10

City of Vancouver: a small area

Tearing: All projections have tearing (edges)

Shearing - Shapes/angles contorted

Compression: Changes to area

Compression: Changes to area

Compromise

Strikes a balance between for aesthetics.

What projection is right for my map?

There isn't a "correct" answer here, but there are definitely wrong answers. You can typically get similar results with a handful of different projections, depending on your application.

Things to Think About

Where do the data come from?

  • Some organizations use a standard projection
  • Stats Canada: Lambert Conformal Conic

What is the map's purpose?

  • Conformal/compromise are aesthetically pleasing.
  • Navigational maps, use conformal, equidistant, etc.
  • Thematic map (densities) use equal area.

Scale

The relationship between distance on a map to distance in the real world.

How much smaller than reality is the map?

Small Scale

Zoomed out, large area, more generalization, less detail.

Large Scale

Zoomed in, small area, more detail, less generalization.

Small Scale 1:10,000,000

1/10,000,000 = 0.0000001

Large Scale 1:1,000

1/1,000 = 0.001

Scale

All maps require simplification of real world features, amount depends on map scale:

-Smaller scale maps require more generalization.

-Larger scale maps can include more detail.

Scale & Projection

Map scale will impact our choice of projection.

Projections that work at 1:000 aren't necessarily suited for a 1:10,000,000 map.

Scale & Projection

With conformal projections like the Mercator, scale changes with position on the map.